Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago

Follow @chapin_hall
Register for our e-Alert or events
  • About
  • Research
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Partners
  • News
  • Fellowships
  • Past Spotlights

Research AreasResearch Areas

  • Child Welfare and Foster Care SystemsChild Welfare and Foster Care Systems
  • Community ChangeCommunity Change
  • Early Childhood InitiativesEarly Childhood Initiatives
  • Economic Supports for FamiliesEconomic Supports for Families
  • Home Visitation and Maltreatment PreventionHome Visitation and Maltreatment Prevention
  • Longitudinal Data AnalyticsLongitudinal Data Analytics
  • Schools and School SystemsSchools and School Systems
  • Workforce DevelopmentWorkforce Development
  • Youth Crime and JusticeYouth Crime and Justice
  • Youth Development and Afterschool InitiativesYouth Development and Afterschool Initiatives
REPORTREPORT

APHSA Chapin Hall National Youth in Transition Database Initiative

Amy Dworsky
2009


In addition to creating the Chafee Foster Care Independence Program, the Foster Care Independence Act of 1999 requires the Administration for Children and Families to create a National Youth in Transition Database. It will be used to track the Chafee-funded independent living services that states provide to foster youth, as well as to assess each state’s performance as measured by foster youth outcomes.

The American Public Human Services Association, Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago and the Center for State Foster Care and Adoption Data proposed working with interested states to: (1) assess states’ willingness and capacity to develop a collective approach for tracking youth and collecting data; (2) document the “state of states” in terms of current tracking and data collection strategies; (3) develop an architectural blueprint that would assist states in their efforts to comply with the National Youth in Transition Database requirements; and (4) design a survey instrument that all states could use that would not only meet, but also exceed, those requirements with respect to outcome measures.

The rationale behind the proposal was twofold. First, if states are given an opportunity to work together, they can reduce the costs that each individual state must bear and develop a uniform tracking and data collection system in which their data is be comparable. Second, if states really want to know how their foster youth are faring and how their provision of Chafee-funded services might be improved, they need to go beyond the data the federal government is requiring them to collect and measure outcomes in greater breadth and depth.

  • NYTD Guidebook Executive Summary
  • NYTD Guidebook

Related

Issue Briefs

  • Continuing in Foster Care Beyond Age 18: How Courts Can Help

Reports

  • Extending Foster Care to Age 21: Weighing the Costs to Government against the Benefits to Youth
  • Helping Former Foster Youth Graduate from College
  • Midwest Evaluation of the Adult Functioning of Former Foster Youth
  • Review of Policies and Programs Supporting Youth Transitioning Out of Foster Care

Presentations

  • Extending Foster Care to Age 21: Benefits, Costs, and Opportunities for States

Experts

  • Amy Dworsky

Share this page

Tweet Widget Facebook Like LinkedIn StumbleUpon Print HTML Print Mail
© 2012 Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago / 1313 East 60th Street, Chicago, Illinois 60637 / 773.256.5100 /
  • Privacy Policy
  • Webmaster