Chapin Hall

Early Implementation of Extended Foster Care Requires Engagement and Patience

Title IV-E was amended when the Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act was signed into law in 2008. The Fostering Connections Act gives states the option of extending the age limit of foster care up to age 21. California has the largest foster care population of any state and became one of the earliest adopters of extended foster care when it passed the Assembly Bill 12 (AB 12) in 2010. This report examines the planning and implementation processes of AB 12.

 What we did

We collected data from June 2011 to September 2012. This included a review of transcripts of the Assembly and Senate committees during the 2009–10 legislative session and the text of AB 12. We also collected observational data while attending implementation planning meetings with stakeholders and participating in monthly conference calls designed to update service providers about AB 12 developments. The majority of our data came from in-depth interviews with key informants who played a critical role in AB 12. In phase one, we interviewed 38 key informants involved in the passage and implementation planning for AB 12. In phase two, we interviewed 63 key informants about their experiences with AB 12 since the law took effect. We also conducted five focus groups with 39 young people to get their perspective on the legislation.

 What we found

Some key lessons from California’s experience of extending care include:

• States should pay attention to the ways that serving young adults instead of minors calls not only for changes in policies, but also for changes in the cultures of the institutions involved in providing services.
• States should be inclusive in terms of who they invite to the table during planning for extended foster care.
• Extending foster care requires substantial resources for both planning and implementation. In the absence of philanthropic support, states should not underestimate the extent of public resources that are needed.
• Time for implementation planning is crucial. Spending more time on planning can help avoid unintended consequences down the road.
• Involve young people in planning and listen to them throughout implementation. Attend to the needs of special populations of youth.
• The federal government should learn from the experiences of states like California that are early adopters of extended foster care and help to engage states in a collaborative learning process.

What it means

The most important lesson other states might learn from California’s experience with extending foster care is that it requires considerable effort, time, and patience. It also requires the engagement of a host of stakeholders whose agendas sometimes compete.